Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • Introduction The number of patients with

    2021-06-15

    Introduction The number of patients with type 2 diabetes is increasing globally, and has become a serious public health problem. Type 2 diabetic patients exhibit a higher risk of bone fracture [1]. In addition, clinical studies have indicated that increased fracture risk is associated with long-term use of anti-hyperglycemic drugs [2]. For example, patients treated with thiazolidinedione or human recombinant insulin exhibit higher fracture incidence [[3], [4], [5], [6]], whereas those treated with metformin show lower fracture risk [7]. Osteoclasts differentiated from bone marrow KU-55933 are responsible for normal bone remodeling and pathologic bone resorption [8]. In the pathophysiology of inflammatory diseases of bone, such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoclast recruitment plays an important role in bone erosion [9]. Receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) are commonly accepted as two indispensable factors during the process of osteoclastogenesis [10]. Moreover, it has been reported that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α can induce osteoclastogenesis both in vitro [[11], [12], [13]] and in vivo [14,15]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a strong inducer of inflammation, which results in inflammatory bone loss [[16], [17], [18], [19], [20]]. LPS can stimulate RANKL secretion [21] and M-CSF expression [22] from osteoblasts or bone marrow stromal cells. In addition, LPS has been found to induce the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, from macrophages or other neighboring cells at sites of inflammation [23,24]. These pro-inflammatory cytokines are reportedly involved in LPS-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone destruction, both in vivo and in vitro [[25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4; also known as the T cell surface marker CD26) was initially investigated for its involvement in the activation of T cells [30,31]. Later, DPP-4 was identified as an enzyme responsible for degrading many chemokines and incretin hormones, which are involved in the regulation of the immune system [32]. Therefore, DDP-4 has been considered as a possible participant in the inflammatory process [33,34]. DPP-4 inhibitor, a new anti-hyperglycemic therapy, maintains the blood glucose level by initially inhibiting the enzymatic activity of DPP-4, and subsequently inhibiting the degradation of incretin hormones that can stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells [33]. Through this mechanism, DPP-4 inhibitor is effective in the treatment of type 2 diabetes without the production of major side effects. The role of DPP-4 inhibitors in the regulation of insulin and glucagon secretion KU-55933 is well-known, but there is currently little evidence that the use of a DPP-4 inhibitor can directly improve chronic inflammation [35,36]. However, the effect of DPP-4 inhibition in inflammation remains largely unknown. Recently, the effect of DPP-4 inhibition on bone metabolism has been extensively studied. Clinical studies indicated that diabetic patients treated with DPP-4 inhibitors exhibit reduced fracture risk, compared with patients who were treated with other antidiabetic drugs. Furthermore, the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin demonstrated positive effects on bone metabolism through improvements in bone quality, bone density, and bone markers [[37], [38], [39], [40]]. We suspect that these positive skeletal effects of DPP-4 inhibitors may arise from modulation of energy metabolism pathways associated with DPP-4 and incretin peptides.
    Material and methods
    Results
    Discussion Diabetic patients suffer from a higher risk of osteoporosis, possibly because of the decreased bone turnover associated with poor glycemic control [42]. Moreover, many studies have indicated that long-term use of some antidiabetic drugs has a negative effect on bone metabolism [2,43]. However, recent clinical studies have indicated that diabetic patients treated with DPP-4 inhibitor demonstrate a reduced fracture rate, compared with diabetic patients treated with other therapies [[37], [38], [39], [40]]. Therefore, long-term use of DPP-4 inhibitors has received attention for its supplementary effect in the treatment of osteoporosis. Other skeletal effects of DPP-4 inhibitors, including effects on inflammatory bone resorption, are also promising. To the best of our knowledge, there have been few reports regarding the short-term effect of DPP-4 inhibitor administration on osteoclast formation in inflammatory conditions.